Connect with us

Business

Zimbabwe Eyes China as Next Big Blueberry Frontier

Published

on

Zimbabwe Eyes China as Next Big Blueberry Frontier
Zimbabwean blueberry farmers inspect ripe berries ahead of export season. The country is preparing to expand shipments following a new trade deal granting access to the Chinese market

Zimbabwean blueberry farmers are urging the government to introduce investment-friendly policies that will help position the country as Africa’s largest blueberry exporter.

The call follows a breakthrough agreement signed in September that opened the Chinese market to Zimbabwean blueberries for the first time.

Expanding Horizons: From Europe to Asia

Until now, Zimbabwe’s blueberry exports were limited mainly to Europe, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.

The new deal with China, one of the world’s fastest-growing fruit markets, marks a major step forward for the country’s horticultural sector.

Globally, Peru and Chile dominate blueberry exports to China, and Zimbabwean growers hope to join that league by ramping up production and improving competitiveness.

Production Set to Surge by 50%

According to the Horticultural Development Council (HDC), Zimbabwe’s blueberry output is expected to grow from 8,000 tonnes in 2024 to 12,000 tonnes in 2025, representing a 50% increase.

The HDC said the China export protocol builds on the 2024 avocado export agreement, further reinforcing horticulture’s vital role in the nation’s economy.

“Our ambition under the Horticulture Recovery and Growth Plan is to transform the sector into a US$2 billion industry,” the HDC said in a statement.

“Driven by the global demand for healthy food, China’s blueberry imports have risen from just 665 tonnes in 2005 to nearly 39,000 tonnes in 2024, mainly from Peru and Chile.

Zimbabwe’s blueberries, known for their distinctive flavour and texture, offer a new and exciting supply option for that market.”

Currently, Morocco leads Africa’s blueberry production with over 80,000 tonnes annually, but Zimbabwe aims to challenge that position with the right policy environment and investment support.

Farmers Call for Investment-Friendly Policies

Clarence Mwale, CEO and founder of Kuminda, a collective representing small and medium-scale farmers, and board member of the HDC, told Farmer’s Weekly that local producers are already in talks with the government about necessary reforms to unlock growth.

“The deal with China opens our blueberries to a market of 1.4 billion consumers, many of whom can afford premium fruits,” Mwale said.

“But we need to boost production first, which requires supportive investment policies.”

He noted that blueberry cultivation is capital-intensive, and high interest rates discourage borrowing. Additionally, inconsistent investment regulations deter foreign investors.

“We need to revise our investment policies. To double our current planting area to 1,500 hectares, we require more than US$100 million in investment,” Mwale explained.

Mwale also highlighted concerns over the current system, where exporters receive only 30% of their earnings in local currency, with the rest converted under restrictive rules, making Zimbabwe less attractive to international financiers.

He believes empowering young farmers could also help expand the industry.

“If we could support around 100 young farmers with access to funding, we could significantly increase exports to China,” he added.

Kuminda has already partnered with Fruit Vision, holding a contract to grow 2,000 hectares of blueberry varieties across Southern Africa.

These varieties, developed in the Netherlands, are also cultivated in Spain.

China’s Strict Quality Standards

Following the new trade deal, the General Administration of Customs of China (GACC) released detailed import requirements for Zimbabwean blueberries.

All orchards, packing facilities, and quarantine stations must be audited and registered with both Zimbabwean and Chinese authorities.

Compliance includes implementing good agricultural practices, maintaining sanitary conditions, and using integrated pest management to minimise quarantine risks.

Key pests of concern include:

  •  Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata)
  •  Mango fruit fly (C. cosyra)
  • White wax scale (Ceroplastes destructor)
  • Long-tailed mealybug (Pseudococcus longispinus)
  • Obscure mealybug (P. viburni)

During packing, fruit must be graded, cleaned, and inspected to remove any damaged produce or debris. Storage facilities must also be separated to prevent reinfestation.

Exporters are required to keep pest monitoring records for at least two years, available for inspection by Chinese customs.

The GACC warned that shipments from unregistered or non-compliant producers could be rejected or destroyed upon arrival in China.

A New Chapter for Zimbabwe’s Horticulture

The entry into the Chinese market is being hailed as a milestone for Zimbabwe’s agricultural diversification.

However, industry players stress that long-term success depends on creating a stable, transparent, and investor-friendly policy environment.

If government and farmers align their efforts, analysts believe Zimbabwe could soon rival Morocco, and potentially emerge as Africa’s leading blueberry exporter.

 

Business

COTTCO Scandal: US$70 Million Vanishes as Farmers Suffer, Governance in Crisis

Published

on

Harare, Zimbabwe  – A shocking exposé has rocked the Cotton Company of Zimbabwe Limited (COTTCO), revealing that over US$70 million in crucial funding has allegedly been mismanaged within a single year. This staggering revelation comes as COTTCO continues to fail in its fundamental duty to pay thousands of struggling cotton farmers, sparking outrage and raising serious questions about corporate governance and accountability within state-linked entities.

The bombshell dropped during a Parliamentary Portfolio Committee hearing on Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development. John Mangudya, the Chief Executive of the Mutapa Investment Fund, laid bare the grim reality: despite receiving massive financial injections, COTTCO remains a financial black hole, unable to meet its obligations to the very people who sustain the cotton industry.

Mangudya’s testimony painted a damning picture. He disclosed that COTTCO benefits from approximately US$60 million annually in government-backed input support. On top of this, the Mutapa Investment Fund injected an additional US$11 million last year, specifically intended to help clear COTTCO’s mounting debts. Yet, despite this colossal sum – a total exceeding US$70 million – the company still failed to settle an estimated US$25 million in debts.

“This points to serious financial mismanagement,” Mangudya asserted, directly implicating COTTCO’s board and executive for their glaring failures in oversight. He highlighted a disturbing pattern of corporate governance lapses and strong indications of financial irregularities that demand immediate and thorough investigation. In a particularly egregious revelation, Mangudya confirmed that a significant portion of the US$11 million from Mutapa – approximately US$6.6 million – which was explicitly allocated for farmer payments, was instead diverted to service bank debts. This desperate move was reportedly made under duress, as lenders threatened to seize company assets, leaving farmers in the lurch.

In a move that smacks of crisis management, COTTCO’s board resolved on April 28, 2026, to place the company under voluntary corporate rescue. This decision, made under Section 122 of the Insolvency Act (Chapter 6:07), acknowledges the company’s dire financial state, characterized by crippling liquidity constraints, astronomical debt levels, and an ever-growing pile of arrears. While Mangudya attempted to spin this as a “strength” – a necessary intervention to protect COTTCO and facilitate investigation – the reality is that it exposes a profound systemic failure.

“The process that we have taken is a good one because the corporate rescue practitioner will investigate what was happening,” Mangudya stated, attempting to reassure a skeptical public. He insisted that the appointment of corporate rescue practitioners, Farai Chibisa and Ian Mtetwa of Grant Thornton Zimbabwe, would not halt any ongoing investigations or forensic audits. Their mandate is to oversee the restructuring and implement a turnaround strategy, with COTTCO optimistically claiming viability due to its asset base and market presence.

However, this optimism rings hollow for the thousands of cotton farmers who remain unpaid, their livelihoods jeopardized by what appears to be gross negligence and potential corruption. The scale of this alleged financial mismanagement is set to ignite a firestorm of demands for accountability. The corporate rescue process, while perhaps a legal necessity, must not become a shield for those responsible. It must serve as a conduit for a comprehensive, transparent review of COTTCO’s financial affairs, with a clear commitment from Mangudya that any evidence of wrongdoing will be met with decisive action. The Zimbabwean public, and especially its hardworking farmers, deserve nothing less than full transparency and justice for this egregious misuse of public and farmer funds.

Continue Reading

Business

Kutsaga fueling food security and rural growth

Published

on

Kutsaga fueling food security and rural growth

Kutsaga Research Station, once synonymous with Zimbabwe’s tobacco industry, is now spearheading a transformative agricultural revolution, pivoting its scientific prowess towards rural industrialisation and national food security.

This monumental shift, lauded by Agriculture Permanent Secretary Prof. Dr. Obert Jiri at the recent ZITF 2026, marks a critical stride in aligning research with commercial viability and the nation’s ambitious Vision 2030 agricultural agenda.

Prof. Dr. Jiri said Kutsaga’s innovative expansion beyond its traditional mandate.

He specifically praised the station’s success in developing tissue-cultured virus-free sweet potatoes and pioneering industrial hemp cultivation.

These initiatives exemplify how institutional expertise can be leveraged to create commercially viable products, underscoring the imperative that research must be commercialised to ensure its long-term sustainability.

“Kutsaga’s transformation is not just about diversifying crops, it is about building resilient value chains that directly benefit our rural communities,” said Prof. Dr. Jiri.

ALSO READ: Global seed giants eye Zimbabwe as strategic hub

This strategic redirection aims to reduce the nation’s reliance on single commodities, thereby shielding farmers from the volatile impacts of market fluctuations and climate change.

The move is a direct response to Zimbabwe’s Vision 2030, which prioritises agricultural transformation as a cornerstone for economic growth and stability.

Continue Reading

Business

Prospect Lithium Marks Historic First with Lithium Sulphate Export

Published

on

Prospect Lithium of Zimbabwe has dispatched its first consignment of lithium sulphate from its newly commissioned US$400 million processing plant at Arcadia Mine.

According to the company, this is the first time lithium sulphate has been produced not only in Zimbabwe but across the African continent.

The milestone signals a significant move towards increased local processing of lithium, rather than exporting raw or semi-processed materials.

Prospect described the development as a breakthrough for the country and region, noting that the shipment represents the first production of lithium salts in Zimbabwe and Africa, and highlights progress in mineral beneficiation and industrial growth.

Zimbabwe has been tightening its policies on lithium exports in recent years. In 2022, the government banned the export of raw lithium, pushing mining companies to process the mineral into concentrates.

At that time, major players, including Prospect Lithium (owned by Huayou Cobalt), had already begun upgrading their operations.

In 2025, authorities raised the requirements further, announcing that by 2027, lithium producers will be expected to export sulphate, a higher-value product used in the manufacture of battery materials.

To support this transition, a 10% tax was introduced on lithium concentrates to encourage further processing.

Earlier this year, the government also temporarily halted concentrate exports, later allowing limited shipments under a quota system as producers adjust to the new value-addition requirements.

Continue Reading

Trending